Works by Cutas, Daniela E. (exact spelling)

Order:
  1.  40
    Natural versus Assisted Reproduction: In Search of Fairness.Daniela E. Cutas & Lisa Bortolotti - 2010 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (1).
    In this paper, we are concerned with the ethical implications of the distinction between natural reproduction and reproduction that requires assistance. We argue that the current practice of enforcing regulations on the latter but not on the former means of reproduction is ethically unjustified. It is not defensible to tolerate parental ignorance or abuse in natural reproduction and subsequently in natural parenting, whilst submitting assisted reproduction and parenting to invasive scrutiny. Our proposal is to guarantee equal treatment to people engaging (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  45
    Is it a boy or a girl? Who should (not) know children's sex and why?Daniela E. Cutas & Simona Giordano - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (6):374-377.
    In this paper, we present the case of a couple who refused to disclose the sex of their child to others, and some of the responses that this case prompted in the international media. We outline the ethical issues that this case raises, and we place it into the more general context of parental preferences regarding the gender (development) of their children and of the impact on children of parental choices in the matter. Based on current knowledge of gender identity (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  22
    On a Romanian attempt to legislate on medically assisted human reproduction.Daniela E. Cutas - 2007 - Bioethics 22 (1):56–63.
    ABSTRACT The paper presents and briefly analyses some of the provisions of a Romanian legislative proposal which arrived at the Presidency for ratification twice, in slightly different forms, and which was rejected twice: the first time at the Presidency in October 2004, and the second at the Constitutional Court in July 2005. The proposal was finally dropped in February 2006. My intention here is to point to some of the most problematic deficiencies of the legislative document in the hope that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark